As the Two Parties Quarrel, America’s Competitors Capitalize

The United States' internal gridlock is opening doors for global competitors.

The Big Picture

Partisan polarization in the U.S. is reaching an all-time high, preventing Congress from addressing major domestic and international challenges. The result: policy paralysis, economic uncertainty, and a decline in America's global influence.

While the U.S. remains caught in political infighting, global competitors like China are expanding their economic and geopolitical reach. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Latin America, where China has replaced the U.S. as the dominant trading partner in many key economies.

If the U.S. continues to neglect these issues, our credibility and influence will continue to erode—both at home and abroad.

Zooming In

The rise of gridlock and decline of global strategy

Congress has become a battleground for partisan theatrics rather than governance. As a result:

• Basic legislative functions—like passing a budget—are excruciatingly difficult.
• Political theater has replaced serious policymaking.
• U.S. global strategy has suffered, creating a leadership vacuum for other nations to fill.

While Congress struggles to address domestic policy, global trade and geopolitical stability are taking a backseat. This has serious long-term consequences for U.S. economic power and international standing.

China’s economic expansion in the Americas

The United States was once the primary trading partner for most of Latin America. However, in the past two decades, China has aggressively expanded its economic influence in the region.

• In 2000, the U.S. was the dominant trading partner for Latin America.
• By 2024, China had overtaken the U.S. in trade volume with key Latin American nations.
• The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has cemented Chinese infrastructure and investment throughout the Global South.

While the U.S. political system remains stuck in dysfunction, China is strategically leveraging trade, infrastructure projects, and diplomatic partnerships to expand its global presence.

The rise of BRICS and threats to the u.s. dollar

China’s influence isn't limited to Latin America. The BRICS alliance—which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—has openly challenged U.S. financial dominance.

• BRICS recently expanded to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE.
• The alliance seeks to replace the U.S. dollar as the world’s dominant trade currency.
• Brazilian President Lula explicitly questioned why global trade still depends on the U.S. dollar, saying, “[Why] do all countries have to base their trade on the dollar?” (Source).

These shifts signal a decline in American global leadership, exacerbated by domestic instability and short-sighted economic policies.

Trump’s protectionist approach

President Trump’s return to the White House brings renewed economic nationalism, including:

• 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada. (Source)
• 10% tariffs on imports from China.
• A hardline approach to global trade, aimed at reducing U.S. reliance on foreign economies.

However, history has shown that tariffs often backfire:

• They increase costs for American consumers by making imports more expensive.
• They lead to retaliatory tariffs, hurting U.S. businesses.
• They create instability in global trade, weakening diplomatic relationships.

As American political economist Henry George once said:
"What protection teaches us, is to do to ourselves in time of peace what enemies seek to do to us in time of war."

Data Snapshot

• U.S. polarization is at an all-time high, making governance increasingly difficult.
• China has overtaken the U.S. as the dominant trading partner in Latin America.
• The BRICS alliance is openly challenging U.S. financial dominance.
• Trump’s protectionist policies risk alienating key trade partners, increasing costs for American consumers.

Independent Lens

America’s domestic dysfunction is eroding our global influence. While Congress remains gridlocked, China and other global competitors continue to expand their economic and diplomatic reach.

Independent voters recognize that global leadership requires stability and forward-thinking policies. If the U.S. continues to neglect international strategy, our economic and diplomatic standing will continue to decline.

The challenge now is whether the new administration can shift its focus from short-term political fights to long-term global leadership.

Subscribe to our newsletter for more analysis on how independent voters are shaping America’s future.