After decades working in fragile, polarized political systems worldwide, one lesson stands out: democracy endures when institutions are representative, stable, and able to adapt.
What’s increasingly obvious is that the United States—long seen as a global model—now needs that same pragmatic clarity at home.
We talk endlessly about polarization, extremism, and dysfunction. But three realities continue to block meaningful progress:
1. A Hardened Political Duopoly
America’s political structure has calcified into a structural duopoly, where Democrats and Republicans battle fiercely on policy yet reliably unite to preserve their shared dominance. Gerrymandering is condemned when the other side does it and defended when it benefits “our” team. Competition is applauded until it threatens the system itself.
This isn’t about which party is better. It’s about incentives—how the rules reward behavior regardless of ideology.
2. Eroding Civic Knowledge
With the decline of civic education, countless myths about how government works have filled the void. Patriotism has become performative rather than participatory. Ritual conflict has replaced persuasion. Without shared civic understanding, the nation becomes easier to divide and harder to govern.
3. Mistaking Inertia for Tradition
The Founders never believed they had created a perfect, unchanging system. They expected future generations to continue improving it. The inability to adapt is not tradition—it’s stagnation.
These trends leave the U.S. caught in a paradox: strong institutions on paper, increasingly weak performance in practice. When democratic rules no longer reward accountability, coalition‑building, or follow‑through, governance breaks down.
It was through this lens that I became interested in the work of the Independent Center—not as a theorist, but as someone who has spent years studying how institutions succeed and fail.
The Independent Center: A Practical Path Forward
My first encounter with the Independent Center came in May 2025. What stood out was its pragmatism. Instead of pursuing symbolic gestures or sweeping constitutional redesign, it focuses on how power is actually exercised today—and where leverage truly exists.
The Independent Center begins with a simple, common‑sense premise:
Democracy only works when political actors are rewarded for taking responsibility and doing the hard work of governing.
This premise may seem modest, but taken seriously, it has far‑reaching implications. Seen through this lens, America’s political crisis is not primarily ideological—it’s structural. And structural problems require structural solutions.
Why the House of Representatives Is the Real Pressure Point
Traditional political reformers often focus on the presidency. But even a hypothetical independent president with no congressional bloc behind them would face gridlock, not change.
History shows the same problem at the state level: independent governors like Lowell Weicker and Jesse Ventura won office but lacked the legislative leverage to implement lasting reform.
After years of studying this dynamic, I’ve become convinced:
the most powerful leverage point in American governance is the House of Representatives.
Here’s why:
- The House offers more competitive districts than the Senate.
- Its rules—and the election of the Speaker—are renegotiated every two years.
- A small, disciplined bloc of independent representatives could deny either party a majority.
- That bloc could then insist on institutional reforms as the price of enabling the House to function at all.
This is not theoretical. In 1916, a fractured coalition of independents briefly held real leverage in the House—but lacked cohesion. They were negotiated with individually, their influence evaporated, and the moment passed.
The lesson? Coordination matters. Discipline matters. Strategy matters.
Learning from Past Movements—and Improving on Them
In 2018, I worked with Unite America, a broad coalition of reformers that spanned the ideological spectrum. It was inspiring, but it faced a strategic crossroads:
- Become a disciplined, cohesive third force, or
- Pursue electoral reforms in the hope a healthier system would eventually allow new political actors to emerge.
Unite America chose the latter. But reform alone is slow—often generational. Without political leverage, neither major party has sufficient incentive to adopt reforms that reduce their own power.
The Independent Center recognizes this. Its approach pairs electoral reform with electoral leverage, pursuing both simultaneously rather than sequentially.
Strategy, Not Symbolism: What Makes the Independent Center Different
Using polling, focus groups, and analytical tools, the Independent Center refines its message to identify where an independent movement is most likely to gain traction.
The goal is not to “blow up” the two parties but to break their zero‑sum dynamic—one that produces unstable majorities, short‑term policymaking, and partisan brinkmanship.
A disciplined independent bloc in the House would:
- Stabilize governance
- Reward consensus instead of conflict
- Re-align political incentives
- Reduce the influence of extremists and fringe narratives
- Encourage policies that reflect the broad American center
In short: it would make America governable again.
The Narrow Corridor—and the Path Back to the American Dream
Political economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson call it the narrow corridor: the delicate space where a society keeps the state strong enough to govern but constrained enough to be accountable.
Today, the United States is pressing up against the edges of that corridor. Congress has allowed its own power to erode through legislative inaction. The courts and the presidency have absorbed authority by default. Norms have proven fragile.
Reversing this requires Congress to function again—deliberately, responsibly, and consistently.
This is where independent voters play a transformative role. They are the fastest‑growing political group in the country, the most willing to embrace split-ticket voting, and the most committed to a future rooted in optimism, shared reality, and the American Dream.
Independent voters are not disengaged—they are demanding a politics worthy of their engagement.
And the Independent Center is the first movement in a long while with both the strategy and the discipline to meet that demand.
A Future Worth Fighting For
At this moment in American history, dismissing bold but pragmatic ideas is a luxury we can no longer afford. This isn’t about siding with one party over another. It’s about restoring the conditions under which self‑government becomes possible again.
If we want a future that reflects common‑sense, optimism, and the enduring promise of the American Dream, then empowering independent voices—and building independent leverage—is not just an option.
It is a necessity.
.jpg)
