Despite paying taxes that fund primary elections, independents in many states are told they cannot participate unless they join a political party.
This is the primary problem at the center of our democracy—and it’s quietly shaping who gets elected, how campaigns are run, and why Congress remains polarized.
To understand the stakes, we must first define open primaries:
Open primaries are elections in which all registered voters—Republicans, Democrats, and independents—can participate, regardless of party affiliation.
By contrast:
Today, roughly half of U.S. states still use closed or semi‑closed primaries, meaning tens of millions of voters have no meaningful say in choosing the candidates who will appear on the November ballot.
In most congressional districts, the general election is essentially predetermined. Gerrymandering and geographic sorting create “safe” Democratic or Republican seats where the real contest occurs months earlier—in the primary election, not the general.
Independent voters know the feeling: by the time November arrives, the choices are already made for them.
Our nationwide polling reveals:
When independents are blocked from primaries, candidates are selected by the extremes, not the mainstream.
Independent voters—sometimes inaccurately labeled an independent political party—are not a single party at all. They are a diverse group with varied independent party beliefs, united by a desire for:
Our 2025 polling shows:
The longstanding “spoiler” narrative is losing power because voters increasingly see it for what it is: a strategy major parties use to protect their duopoly.
Younger Americans, especially Gen Z and Millennials, are redefining what political engagement looks like. They want more choices—not just two options chosen by party insiders.
Key findings:
Gen Z isn’t disengaged—they’re demanding a modern political system that reflects their values of flexibility, pragmatism, and independence.
Across the electorate:
Yet closed primaries produce the opposite outcome: candidates rewarded for appealing to partisan bases, not broad coalitions.
Open primaries ensure that every taxpayer has a voice in elections they’re paying for. States like California, Washington, and Alaska have pioneered models such as:
These reforms have led to:
Support for reform is strong:
Independent political organizations—including The Independent Center—are now driving reform efforts nationwide.
Open primaries alone can’t fix a rigged system. Gerrymandering suppresses voter choice by creating “safe” seats. Our polling shows:
Open primaries + independent commissions = genuine competition and representation.
In 2025, open primary legislation advanced in:
Active campaigns also emerged in:
Independent political organizations across the country are uniting to push structural reforms that give independents equal participation.
What You Can Do—No Matter Your State
Closed vs. open primaries vary widely. Check our state‑by‑state guide.
Volunteer, donate, or share their work. Reform happens bottom‑up.
Even in closed primary states, general elections and ballot initiatives matter.
When someone dismisses an independent candidate, explain the truth:
The only thing being spoiled is the two parties’ control over your choices.
Independent voters are no longer a footnote. They are a force. With open primaries, fair maps, and a renewed focus on voters—not parties—we can restore a democracy that listens to everyone.
It’s time to open the gates.