The votes are counted, the races are called, and it is tempting to think the work of tracking independent voters is done until the next election rolls around. It is not. Most of what shapes independents' standing—primary access, redistricting outcomes, candidate filings, registration rules—gets decided in the eighteen months between elections, not in the weeks around them. State legislatures that convene in early 2027 will take up some of the same open-primary and redistricting questions this research has tracked all year. The next election cycle, including off-year races in Virginia and New Jersey and the start of 2028 primary positioning, is already forming. Research that stops the week after Election Day misses most of what actually changes.
Eight of the country's 99 state legislative chambers hold regularly scheduled elections in 2027, with general elections in Mississippi, New Jersey, and Virginia set for November 2, 2027. Redistricting litigation in multiple states is also still working through the courts well after the maps were used in the 2026 midterms. None of this shows up on an election-night results page, and all of it affects how much influence independent voters actually have in the states where they are already the largest registration bloc.
Source: Ballotpedia, "State legislative elections, 2027."
With Virginia, New Jersey, and Mississippi holding state legislative elections in 2027, and candidate filings for 2028 primaries typically beginning well over a year in advance, independent voters who stop paying attention after a midterm often re-engage only once a presidential race is already taking shape, by which point candidate fields, ballot access rules, and primary calendars are largely set.
The registration and primary-access gains independents have made in states like Colorado, Alaska, and Maine did not happen only in election years. They happened through sustained attention to state legislative sessions, ballot initiatives, and court rulings that occur year-round. Stepping back after a midterm cedes exactly the window when these rules are most often revisited.
Didn't the research already cover everything that mattered this cycle?
The midterm-specific research covered what happened on Election Day and in the lead-up to it. It did not cover what state legislatures, courts, and election administrators do with that result afterward, which is where most of the durable changes to independents' standing actually occur.
What does the Independent Center track between election cycles?
State legislative sessions, redistricting litigation, primary-access ballot measures and bills, voter registration trends, and candidate filings for upcoming cycles.
Is this a signal that something new is about to change for independents?
Not necessarily. The point is that change happens continuously, not only in November of even years, so research that pauses after an election misses most of it.
Does the Independent Center take a side on any of the legislative fights it tracks?
No. The Independent Center's research tracks what is happening to independent voters' standing and access, not which party or outcome it prefers.
If research like this is useful to you, sign up for our newsletter. If you think this work should continue between election cycles, not just during them, consider a donation to help fund it.
.svg)